Post content
There's something deeply unsettling about the perfection of new digital avatars. Every calculated gesture, every synchronized blink, every smile that arrives at the exact moment... they're so convincing that we almost forget we're being deceived.
Adolf Loos was right when he said that "ornament is crime," pretending that an object or building was something it wasn't. A century later, his words resonate on our screens.
Hyperrealistic avatars operate under the same logic as wallpaper that imitates brick or plastic tiles that simulate ceramic. They sell us the idea that appearance is more important than substance, that illusion is preferable to authentic reality. But while fake linoleum only deceives our eyes, these avatars manipulate something much more intimate: our capacity to trust what we see and feel.
The promise is seductive: "we'll eliminate the barriers of the artificial to create more natural connections." But what kind of connection can emerge when one of the parties isn't what it pretends to be? It's like building a house on sand foundations and expecting it to be solid.
There's a psychological phenomenon called the "uncanny valley" that describes our instinctive reaction to what is almost human but not completely. It's that uncomfortable feeling we experience when something comes dangerously close to being real without being entirely so. Our brain detects the imposture, even when we can't identify exactly what's wrong. The uncanny valley is one of distrust.
This response isn't a design flaw in our psychology; it's a security feature. It protects us from deception, keeps us connected to reality. When we create avatars that try to circumvent this natural defense, we're not improving communication; we're eroding our capacity to distinguish between the real and the fabricated.
Digital history has taught us something valuable. For years, our interfaces imitated physical objects: folders that looked like real folders, buttons that simulated physical buttons. But we matured. We learned to prefer designs that celebrated their digital nature instead of denying it.
Flat icons, vibrant colors, animations impossible in the physical world: all of this represented liberation. We discovered we could create beauty without lying about what we were. Why not apply this same wisdom to our avatars?
Advocates argue that these avatars help us connect better, that the familiarity of the human face facilitates communication. And in certain contexts, they might be right. In therapy, where trust is crucial, or in education, where connection motivates learning, the benefit might justify the illusion.
But in everyday communication, in business relationships, in spaces where authenticity matters, we're paying too high a price for this artificial comfort. We're normalizing deception, getting used to not being able to trust what we see.
Let's imagine avatars that celebrate their digital nature. Representations that change shape according to context, that use impossible colors to convey emotions, that explore the unique possibilities of the digital medium. It wouldn't be less effective; it would be different. And in that difference we could find new forms of expression.
Voice assistants that sound clearly artificial often generate more trust than those that try to imitate imperfect human voices. Honesty works. When something is transparent about its nature, we can relax and focus on what really matters: function, utility, genuine connection.
In the end, the question of hyperrealistic avatars is a question about ourselves: what kind of relationship do we want with our technology? Do we prefer to be comfortably deceived or consciously participate in new forms of communication?
Every time we choose perfect simulation over digital honesty, we're deciding what kind of future we want to inhabit. A world where appearance matters more than substance, where comfort is worth more than truth.
But we could choose differently. We could create tools that help us be more authentically human, not less. Honesty doesn't have to be less beautiful than illusion. Sometimes, it's much more powerful.
–
Written with the help of an AI assistant for documentation and trained on my previous texts.
–
Follow me on LinkedIn to stay updated on new posts.